The batshittery is strong with this one

[lyore]

Orson Scott Card is at it again.

Most of it is just the usual all-women-should-be-barefoot-and-pregnant-TEH-GAY-is-destroying-life-as-we-know-it-Jim bullshit, but there are a few gems that are just too batshit to ignore.

Because when government is the enemy of marriage, then the people who are actually creating successful marriages have no choice but to change governments, by whatever means is made possible or necessary. ... How long before married people answer the dictators thus: Regardless of law, marriage has only one definition, and any government that attempts to change it is my mortal enemy. I will act to destroy that government and bring it down, so it can be replaced with a government that will respect and support marriage, and help me raise my children in a society where they will expect to marry in their turn.

Biological imperatives trump laws. American government cannot fight against marriage and hope to endure. If the Constitution is defined in such a way as to destroy the privileged position of marriage, it is that insane Constitution, not marriage, that will die.

Um...

I'm really, really glad I never bought any of his books. I'd hate to think I financed this crazy in any way.

Comments

[lyore.livejournal.com]

Mm, yes. And not just asexual, but passive, which bugs me just as much. We're really back at the whole 'virgin/whore' thing now, I think, where innocent/passivity = good and desire/activiness = bad. OK, so 'activeness' isn't a word, but you get what I mean.

(And this ties in nicely with a comment I just left over on your blog - our conversations are converging *g*)

I wish I had seen that post! Guys always do seem shocked when something like that comes up :)