I was reading my way through
metafandom, and I came across a couple of people honestly enquiring how what FanLib was doing was any different to FFN, giving that both are funded by advertisements. I wrote up a nice, long comment, and then LJ ate it and crashed Safari. So I've lost not only the comment, but who I was replying to in the first place.
But, since writing it out helped me to get my thoughts in order, I thought I might revisit it here.
( The difference that fans are reacting to is, in my mind, the matter of a) intent, and b) appearance, and c) risk )
I'm not a big fan of FFN, but I think to equate the two is to miss some very fundamental issues that get to the heart of the whole FanLib debate.
ETA Relevant Blog post by profic author here " I’m willing to look the other way for fans, who are just enjoying themselves and not bothering to try to do anything other than have fun. I’m less inclined to look the other way when someone is trying to build a business a) off my fans without compensating them; b) off of my universe and characters without compensating me."
Yeah, what he said.
But, since writing it out helped me to get my thoughts in order, I thought I might revisit it here.
( The difference that fans are reacting to is, in my mind, the matter of a) intent, and b) appearance, and c) risk )
I'm not a big fan of FFN, but I think to equate the two is to miss some very fundamental issues that get to the heart of the whole FanLib debate.
ETA Relevant Blog post by profic author here " I’m willing to look the other way for fans, who are just enjoying themselves and not bothering to try to do anything other than have fun. I’m less inclined to look the other way when someone is trying to build a business a) off my fans without compensating them; b) off of my universe and characters without compensating me."
Yeah, what he said.