We have an apology...
May. 31st, 2007 06:24 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
lyoreLJ issues a statement
Well, took 'em long enough, but looks like our journals are going back up. They better, or there'll be hell to pay.
At least they are admitting they made a mistake.
ETA: Reading through the comments to the post, I'm starting to feel sympathyand a tiny bit of admiration for barakb25. None of it excuses the complete lack of communication (not to mention the absolute fuck-up in the first place), but he sounds sincere, apologetic, and dignified in his statements. (Chris Williams, start taking notes - this is how you apologise!) Of course, I retain the right to withdraw this comment if the communities and journals don't get back up in the next couple of days :)
Well, took 'em long enough, but looks like our journals are going back up. They better, or there'll be hell to pay.
At least they are admitting they made a mistake.
ETA: Reading through the comments to the post, I'm starting to feel sympathy
barakb25. None of it excuses the complete lack of communication (not to mention the absolute fuck-up in the first place), but he sounds sincere, apologetic, and dignified in his statements. (Chris Williams, start taking notes - this is how you apologise!) Of course, I retain the right to withdraw this comment if the communities and journals don't get back up in the next couple of days :)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:35 pm (UTC)I'm most swayed by the complaint of users who were paying big money for their accounts and not to discount those other users who 'simply' lost material they'd invested their time and effort in over the years, but I'm really unimpressed with the abuse some commenters are hurling in
Evidently, LJ need to assemble a broader and better team for this kind of venture in the future and probably in better communication (e.g. any) with those under suspicion. Bad project management, bad!
I admit that I've been generally unmoved by Strikethrough, but that's probably because I'm:
a) all for the objective in which the movement was pursued, though disastrously executed, but I'm an 'ends justify the means' person and I understand that most people won't agree with me (in fact, it's a highly controversial position that's socially impractical).
b) pretty much unaffected by this bar all my friends who've been crying about it on my flist (wait 'til the Heroes comms I'm on disappear, then I might join the chorus),
c) I view the notion of half of Harry Potter fandom collapsing into the vacuum of the Nothing as... a potential benefit. Ok, a little harsh, but my beef is really with Rowling and the nonsense she inspires rather than the inspired themselves. Truly, a diverse array of fandom was affected, but I always come back to the happy thought of even a datum of Harry Potter going poof!
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 01:55 pm (UTC)a) My problem is, apart from the collateral damage, I don't think this was ever going to achieve the aim. WfI announced their intentions to target LJ about a month ago, and since REAL pedophiles watch these communities (at least the smart ones), they had heaps of time to cover their tracks. And seriously - how dumb would you have to be to advertise the fact you were a pedophile in your userinfo? They didn't even check the actual posts.
It's also been pointed out that real LE agencies could have been tracking/watching actual suspect journals, and summarily deleting them would do harm to the investigations.
So it's not even an 'End justifies the Means' question for me, since I don't think those Means would ever achieve their intended End.
b) yeah, me too. One of the times being a Gen fan comes in handy :)
c) A little harsh, yeah :) But, unfortunately, the ones who were deleted were the more adult, less annoying fans, AFAIK.
my beef is really with Rowling and the nonsense she inspires rather than the inspired themselves
OK, that I don't get. You're blaming Rowling for the actions of her fans? I mean, I have lots of issues with Rowling, starting with the travesty that was OOTP and going from there, but I've never blamed her for that.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 02:48 pm (UTC)This is a very good point and I hope LJ didn't botch such investigations otherwise they're going to have to deal with more than a horde of angry users when this comes to its conclusion.
So it's not even an 'End justifies the Means' question for me, since I don't think those Means would ever achieve their intended End.
Their objective definitely isn't something that could be solved with an annual purge and/or deletion, they had the wrong approach so perhaps this is better phrased as the project on the path to an inglorious, messy revolt that was paved with good intentions. I was trying to calculate the numbers of joined fans counted on
b) Ah, gen. Clearly this is an evolutionary imperative of fandom.
c) You mean all the sensible un-emo kids are the ones who vanished? I think fate took the wrong demographic.
You're blaming Rowling for the actions of her fans?
This is where I point at Rowling and hiss, "the seed of fictional travesty!" (You stole my 'travesty' buzz word1!)
I have issues with Rowling starting from the first letter of her first book, she certainly had an idea that sold well (the first eleven publishers that rejected her must still be kicking themselves), but I pity the young generation growing up on her books with a sad and skewed notion of morals and grammar through the broken glasses of The Boy Who Lived. I admit that when I first read the books I was initially hooked too, and it took a while for me to step back and realise that all magicalness in wondrous magical world aside (aspects I still enjoy), her flagship characters and their heroic allies are jocks (Harry), bullies (James and Sirius) and snobs or such people's unintervening accomplices, whose actions she does little to question.
It was okay when the characters were young and stupid (and oh so BRAVE, let's not forget), because the two qualities are interwoven, but I'm by no means advocating the other side of the coin either (you know, the KKK Von Doom Eaters in black led by a half-breed hypocrite). So, who *do* I like in HPverse? [sniff] Maybe just the unicorns and flying cars. They have feelings, too. Oh, and Seamus because he catches on fire a lot in movie verse.
One good thing in all of this is that it will keep fantasy in young people's minds and hopefully they'll be willing to broaden their fantastical horizons from there. Otherwise, God help us all. I coordinated a fanfiction archive for almost seven years, I have witnessed the horror first-hand (this is largely the reason I'm allergic to the site now, but several gems, however, alleviate the duty). If we're going to talk about launching boards, maybe we should sit the next gen of fic writers down to read 1,000,001 books of Mills and Boon until they develop a similar allergy to redundant cliche.
I'm sure some of the greatest writers of the ages started out like Paolini, they just need to see... the errors... of their ways (come to the dark side) and not smite their villains in the fork of their legs (o0;).
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 07:24 am (UTC)But if you consider regular updaters, I suspect the ratio will be a lot higher, and paying members, higher still.
What might be a fairer assessment would be a comparison to the size of any other 'single' group of users out there. Then I think we are getting into significant portion. Unfortunately, I don't know how to check those stats.
And my Harry Potter bit is getting long - so it's going to get it's own post. Stayed tuned :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-02 03:28 am (UTC)