We have an apology...
May. 31st, 2007 06:24 pmLJ issues a statement
Well, took 'em long enough, but looks like our journals are going back up. They better, or there'll be hell to pay.
At least they are admitting they made a mistake.
ETA: Reading through the comments to the post, I'm starting to feel sympathyand a tiny bit of admiration for
barakb25. None of it excuses the complete lack of communication (not to mention the absolute fuck-up in the first place), but he sounds sincere, apologetic, and dignified in his statements. (Chris Williams, start taking notes - this is how you apologise!) Of course, I retain the right to withdraw this comment if the communities and journals don't get back up in the next couple of days :)
Well, took 'em long enough, but looks like our journals are going back up. They better, or there'll be hell to pay.
At least they are admitting they made a mistake.
ETA: Reading through the comments to the post, I'm starting to feel sympathy
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 07:24 am (UTC)But if you consider regular updaters, I suspect the ratio will be a lot higher, and paying members, higher still.
What might be a fairer assessment would be a comparison to the size of any other 'single' group of users out there. Then I think we are getting into significant portion. Unfortunately, I don't know how to check those stats.
And my Harry Potter bit is getting long - so it's going to get it's own post. Stayed tuned :)